March 2025
Consumer Credit Economy Report

What Consumers Do When Their Go-To Credit Choice Is Unavailable

Consumers often need a ‘Plan B’ when they can’t use their preferred form of credit to pay for something. Some shoppers pivot to another credit option — but many others decide to skip or delay their purchase.

Get Unlimited Access
Complete the form below for free, unlimited access to all our Data Studies, Trackers, and MonitorEdge reports.

Thank you for registering. Please confirm your email to view all our Trackers.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Not every credit purchase goes smoothly. Whether they’re using a credit card, buy now, pay later (BNPL) or another credit option, sometimes a consumer can’t pay with their first choice. Perhaps the merchant doesn’t accept it. Or maybe a shopper has hit their credit limit or run into another snag. Many shoppers in this situation might use another form of credit — but even more will likely delay or skip their purchase.

    PYMNTS Intelligence’s latest research focuses on what consumers do when they decide to buy something with credit but can’t use their first choice of payment. For example, shoppers who wanted to pay with mainstream options such as credit cards or BNPL are much less likely to borrow from family or friends compared to those who planned to pay with alternative options such as personal or payday loans. Meanwhile, those who prioritize the rewards available from their preferred payment method are the most likely to use another credit option to complete their purchase rather than forgo buying altogether.

    These are just some of the findings detailed in “What Consumers Do When Their Go-to Credit Choice Is Unavailable,” a PYMNTS Intelligence special report. This edition examines how consumers manage expenses when they can’t use their primary credit product. It draws on insights from a survey of 2,342 consumers conducted from Feb. 11 to Feb. 18.

    What’s the Alternative?

    Consumers are most likely to use other credit products or skip their purchase altogether when they can’t use their preferred form of credit.

    Essential and nonessential expenses

    This report examines how essential and nonessential expenses are paid for by looking at two groups of shoppers

    Essential expenses: This data focuses on consumers who paid using credit for at least one necessary expense within the last 90 days of the survey dates.
    Nonessential expenses: This data focuses on consumers who paid using credit for at least one optional expense within the last 90 days of the survey dates.

    Among consumers who recently made an essential purchase using credit, 76% used credit cards, 6.1% used BNPL or other installment plans, and 18% used some other form of credit.1 For nonessential purchases, the totals are similar, with 73% using credit cards, 10% using BNPL or installment plans and 18% using another type of credit.

    We then asked these consumers what they would do if their first choice of credit payment method were unavailable. For essential expenses, shoppers most frequently say they would likely use a different credit product, at 37%. One in three said they would skip the purchase. Many consumers would buy something cheaper or delay the current purchase.

    Turning to nonessential expenses, shoppers most often say they would likely skip or delay the purchase, at 34% and 33%, respectively. Using another credit product follows closely, at 32%. Other common alternatives for optional purchases include pivoting to something cheaper and delaying another expense instead of the current one.

    Overall, the data varies little between essential and nonessential expenses. This highlights that consumers face the same basic financial and credit access constraints for both categories. The primary difference is that shoppers are less likely to skip or delay necessary expenses when forced into a Plan B scenario. That said, the fact that so many consumers would do so reflects the unmet demand for credit in times of need.


    Turning to Family and Friends

    Consumers who want to pay with alternative forms of credit, avoid credit or have many active credit products are especially likely to seek help from family or friends.

    Borrowing money from family or friends can be a last resort, but some groups are particularly likely to do so. For example, the younger the consumer is, the more they name this as a backup option when they cannot access credit. One-third of Generation Z respondents say they would likely do so, followed by 29% of millennials. Lower-income consumers and those facing persistent cash crunches are also particularly likely to do so.

    More interestingly, consumers on both ends of the credit use spectrum show high tendencies to borrow from family or friends. Those with no current active credit products are the most likely to name this as an option, at 39% for essentials and 34% for nonessentials. Meanwhile, those with more than five active credit products are also very likely, particularly for essential purchases, at 34%. These are roughly twice the rates seen among shoppers with one to four active credit products.

    Shifting the focus to what consumers say is their single most likely backup plan reveals another valuable insight. Respondents who already planned to pay with an alternative source of credit — meaning anything other than a credit card, BNPL or installment plan — are much more likely than others to borrow from family or friends when that option is unavailable. Among these individuals, 15% say this borrowing would be their top alternative for essential expenses and 16% for nonessentials. These are more than twice the rates among consumers initially planning to pay with mainstream options.

    Rewards and Familiarity

    Consumers who prioritize earning rewards are the most likely to use a different form of credit as their backup plan.

    When shoppers cannot use their selected credit product, their backup plan depends on what they value most in their initial payment method choice. Consumers who name better rewards as the top factor behind their original choice would most likely use another credit option. Meanwhile, respondents who initially selected the quickest or only way to access money would mostly skip the purchase.

    Consumers who say familiarity drove their initial credit payment preference show the most dynamic behavior between essential and nonessential purchases. When the expense is nonessential, they are most likely to use a different credit product, at 27%. This share falls to 20% for essential purchases, behind choosing a cheaper alternative, at 23%.

    At the same time, the share of those who would most likely borrow from family or friends is far higher for essential expenses, at 14%, than for nonessential expenses, at just 3.3%. This suggests that the familiarity of a favorite card only goes so far in times of need. For many consumers, tight credit limits can prevent their go-to card from having sufficient spending ability to cover the unexpected.

    Read More

    PYMNTS Intelligence is the leading provider of information on the trends driving innovation in consumer finance, digital payments and financial inclusion. To stay up to date, subscribe to our newsletters and read our in-depth reports.

    Methodology

    What Consumers Do When Their Go-To Credit Choice Is Unavailable” is based on a survey of 2,342 consumers conducted from Feb. 11 to Feb. 18. This report examines how consumers manage expenses when their primary credit product is unavailable. Our sample was census-balanced to match the U.S. population, with 51% of respondents identifying as female. The average respondent’s age was 48, and 40% annually earn more than $100,000.


    1. “Other credit products,” or alternative sources of credit, include personal loans, student loans, auto loans, payday loans, home equity loans, rent-to-own agreements, pawnshop loans, debt consolidation loans, credit-builder loans, overdraft coverage and any other credit product. They do not include the core credit group of credit cards, store cards, buy now, pay later and installment plans offered by the merchant or a third party.

    About

    PYMNTS Intelligence is a leading global data and analytics platform that uses proprietary data and methods to provide actionable insights on what’s now and what’s next in payments, commerce and the digital economy. Its team of data scientists include leading economists, econometricians, survey experts, financial analysts and marketing scientists with deep experience in the application of data to the issues that define the future of the digital transformation of the global economy. This multilingual team has conducted original data collection and analysis in more than three dozen global markets for some of the world’s leading publicly traded and privately held firms.

    The PYMNTS Intelligence team that produced this report:
    Yvonni Markaki, PhD: SVP, Data Products
    Lauren Chojnacki, PhD: Senior Research Manager
    Tomás Coronel: Senior Analyst
    Daniel Gallucci: Senior Writer
    Lynnley Browning: Managing Editor

    We are interested in your feedback on this report. If you have questions or comments, or if you would like to subscribe to this report, please email us at feedback@pymnts.com.

    Disclaimer

    The Consumer Credit Economy Report may be updated periodically. While reasonable efforts are made to keep the content accurate and up to date, PYMNTS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE CORRECTNESS, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, ADEQUACY, OR RELIABILITY OF OR THE USE OF OR RESULTS THAT MAY BE GENERATED FROM THE USE OF THE INFORMATION OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL SATISFY YOUR REQUIREMENTS OR EXPECTATIONS. THE CONTENT IS PROVIDED “AS IS” AND ON AN “AS AVAILABLE” BASIS. YOU EXPRESSLY AGREE THAT YOUR USE OF THE CONTENT IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK. PYMNTS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY INTERRUPTIONS IN THE CONTENT THAT IS PROVIDED AND DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THE CONTENT, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT AND TITLE. SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN WARRANTIES, AND IN SUCH CASES, THE STATED EXCLUSIONS DO NOT APPLY. PYMNTS RESERVES THE RIGHT AND SHOULD NOT BE LIABLE SHOULD IT EXERCISE ITS RIGHT TO MODIFY, INTERRUPT, OR DISCONTINUE THE AVAILABILITY OF THE CONTENT OR ANY COMPONENT OF IT WITH OR WITHOUT NOTICE.

    PYMNTS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER AND, IN PARTICULAR, SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES OR DAMAGES FOR LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF REVENUE, OR LOSS OF USE ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE CONTENT, WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES ARISE IN CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, TORT, UNDER STATUTE, IN EQUITY, AT LAW, OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF PYMNTS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

    SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR THE LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, AND IN SUCH CASES, SOME OF THE ABOVE LIMITATIONS DO NOT APPLY. THE ABOVE DISCLAIMERS AND LIMITATIONS ARE PROVIDED BY PYMNTS AND ITS PARENTS, AFFILIATED AND RELATED COMPANIES, CONTRACTORS, AND SPONSORS, AND EACH OF ITS RESPECTIVE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, MEMBERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, CONTENT COMPONENT PROVIDERS, LICENSORS, AND ADVISERS.

    Components of the content original to and the compilation produced by PYMNTS is the property of PYMNTS and cannot be reproduced without its prior written permission.